Still Writing Checks to Charity? There's a Smarter Way.
A practical guide to donor-advised funds.
George Chang
April 20, 2026
At a recent dinner with friends, the topic of giving came up. Good people, doing good things.
When I asked if anyone was using a donor-advised fund (DAF), many hadn't heard of it.
That's not unusual. Donor-advised funds have been around for decades, but they're still one of the most overlooked tools available to people who give. If you're philanthropic and you're also a high earner: a physician, a tech professional, someone who owns investments that have grown over the years, it's worth understanding how they work.
A donor-advised fund (DAF) is a charitable giving account sponsored by a nonprofit organization. You make a contribution, claim an immediate tax deduction, and then recommend grants to your chosen charities over time, on your schedule, at your pace.
Think of it as a charitable account with meaningful tax advantages built in. Your money can stay invested and grow tax-free until you're ready to send it to the organizations you care about.
This is where most people leave real money on the table.
If you own investments that have grown in value such as stocks, mutual funds, ETFs, and you sell those shares to write a check to charity, you first owe capital gains tax on the profit. Depending on your situation, that can be up to 23.8% federally on long-term gains. You donate what's left.
But if you contribute those appreciated shares directly to a donor-advised fund, you skip the capital gains tax entirely. The full market value goes into the account. You get a deduction based on that full amount, not the after-tax proceeds.
Your charity receives more. You get a larger deduction. Nobody pays the capital gains. It's one of the rare situations in tax planning where doing the efficient thing also means doing the more generous thing.
The same logic applies during portfolio rebalancing. Rather than selling an appreciated position to shift into a different allocation and triggering a capital gain, you can donate those shares to your DAF and use cash you'd already earmarked for charity to make the replacement purchase. You accomplish the rebalance without the tax bill.
(Note: The IRS limits how much of this deduction you can take in a single year based on your income. Your tax advisor can walk you through the specifics for your situation.)
Another practical benefit: DAFs separate the timing of your tax deduction from when you actually distribute the funds.
In a high-income year (a large bonus, a practice transition, a particularly strong investment year), you can make a substantial contribution to your DAF and take the deduction when it's most valuable.
This is useful for anyone whose philanthropic goals are still evolving, or who simply doesn't want to make rushed end-of-year charitable decisions just to capture a tax benefit.
If you give to multiple organizations each year, a DAF eliminates the paperwork. Instead of tracking receipts from a dozen different charities at tax time, you have one tax receipt from the DAF covering everything.
It's also a practical solution for giving to smaller organizations that can't accept stock transfers directly. You contribute appreciated shares to your DAF; the DAF liquidates them tax-free and issues a cash grant to the charity. The organization receives cash; you've still avoided the capital gains.
DAFs are offered through many institutions, and the differences matter less than most people expect at first. The major national providers, Fidelity Charitable, Schwab Charitable, and Vanguard Charitable, are well-established and handle a wide range of asset types.
Fidelity and Schwab have no minimum initial contribution, which makes them accessible if you're just getting started or plan to use the DAF primarily as a convenience vehicle. Vanguard requires a $25,000 minimum to open an account but offers some of the lowest underlying investment costs in the industry. Newer platforms like Daffy take a different approach with a flat monthly subscription fee rather than a percentage of assets, which can make more sense as balances grow.
The right provider depends on your balance, how actively you plan to grant, and how you prefer to manage accounts. A fee-only financial advisor can help you think through which structure fits.
If charitable giving is already part of your financial picture, and especially if you own appreciated investments, a donor-advised fund is worth a conversation. The mechanics are straightforward, setup is often done entirely online, and the tax benefits can be meaningful.
If you're still writing checks, you may be making giving more expensive than it needs to be. The good news is that's easy to change.
This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute individualized financial, tax, or legal advice. Please consult a qualified tax or financial professional regarding your specific situation.
I founded Pillar Point Wealth Management to deliver the kind of financial guidance I’d want for my own family: attentive, transparent, and truly personal. My goal is to help you gain clarity, confidence, and peace of mind as you navigate your financial life.
By Appointment:
580 California Street Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Mailing Address:
2443 Fillmore St, #380-2916
San Francisco, CA 94115
Email:
info@pillarpointwealth.com
Advisory services offered through Pillar Point Wealth Management LLC, an investment adviser registered with the state of California. Advisory services are only offered to clients or prospective clients where Pillar Point Wealth Management LLC and its representatives are properly registered or exempt from registration.
The information on this site is not intended as tax, accounting or legal advice, nor is it an offer or solicitation to buy or sell, or as an endorsement of any company, security, fund, or other offering. Information provided should not be solely relied upon for decision making. Please consult your legal, tax, or accounting professional regarding your specific situation. Investments involve risk and have the potential for complete loss. It should not be assumed that any recommendations made will necessarily be profitable.